Restricting Abortion, Spanish Style

Eric Metaxas | BreakPoint | Wednesday, February 19, 2014

In late December, the government of Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy [rah-hoy] proposed significant changes to the country’s four-year-old law governing abortion.


The left-leaning newspaper el Pais called the proposed law “the most restrictive abortion law in the democratic world.” Whether or not that’s true, it’s a debate that should be of interest outside of Spain—in particular for what it says about our own abortion regime.

To fully appreciate what’s at stake, a brief history lesson is in order: Abortion was illegal in Spain until 1985. Then, the Socialist government of Felipe Gonzalez legalized the procedure in cases of rape, “serious risk to the physical and mental health of the mother,” and “malformations or defects, physical or mental, in the fetus.”

The 1985 law didn’t create a right to abortion-on-demand. That “right” only became a part of Spanish law in 2010, when another Socialist government, led by José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, legalized abortion-on-demand through the first fourteen weeks.

Rajoy’s center-right Popular Party is proposing a more restrictive version of the 1985 law. It limits abortion to cases of rape or where there is grave danger to the life or physical and/or mental health of the woman, a determination to be made by physicians.

In an interview with el Pais, the Spanish Minister of Justice defended eliminating abortion in cases of fetal abnormality by saying that being disabled should not result in unequal treatment under the law. That certainly sounds logical to me.

Of course, the response to the proposed law has been predictable. A Newsweek headline proclaimed “Spain’s Government Pushes Unpopular Abortion Ban,” and the accompanying article told readers about “tens of thousands” at an opposition rally in Madrid.

What none of these articles mention is that more than a million Spaniards gathered in Madrid just four years ago to protest the legalization of abortion-on-demand.

Now, it’s unclear whether the proposed law will be enacted. I pray it will. And I’m grateful for the efforts of the Spanish government. Not only because it’s a step in the direction of protecting unborn human life, but also because of the light it shines on abortion in our country.

What stands out in researching the history of Spain’s abortion laws is that, even under socialist governments, they afford far more protection to unborn children than ours do.

The 2010 law, promulgated by actual socialists, limited abortion on demand to the first fourteen weeks of pregnancy. From the fifteenth to the twenty-second week, abortion is only available “in cases of serious risks to life or health of the mother or fetus.”

After the twenty-second week, the only grounds for abortion are when “fetal anomalies incompatible with life are detected” or when “an extremely serious and incurable disease is detected.”

Millions of American pro-lifers would be thrilled if we could enact similar legislation here in the United States. But in January, the Supreme Court ruled that Arizona cannot enforce a ban on abortions after twenty weeks—leaving us as one of the few nations that allow abortion-on-demand after fetal viability, a step not even Spanish socialists are willing to take.

All of which makes America’s current abortion laws truly radical.

Those of us who work to protect the dignity of every human life at every stage should be encouraged by these developments in Spain—and as I’ve said before, in the fact that Americans are growing increasingly uncomfortable with unfettered abortion. And as for America’s pro-abortion forces, they may soon begin to realize that they—to borrow a phrase—are on the wrong side of history.

I will continue to bring posts on the Abortion  Murder on demand!

4 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Chris
    Feb 20, 2014 @ 00:58:30

    It is a subject that needs to be addressed as often as possible. Thank you for sharing this good news/bad news story. My understanding is that it is easier to teach creationism in some socialist countries than it is here. Incredible.

    God bless you my friend…


    • Mannyr
      Feb 20, 2014 @ 18:05:46

      I think we will see some horrific changes in nations that previously followed our Lord. It seems that modernism is the front for Socialistic advancement; claiming to be modern yet invoking bondages to life, liberty and the pursuit of happyness.


  2. Delight in Truth
    Feb 24, 2014 @ 02:07:31

    Down’s syndrome is one of the big reasons for abortion in afluent circles in America today. The same folks on the other hand cry discrimination when a person of a different sexual orientation suffers a perceived inequality. How sad is that?


    • Mannyr
      Feb 28, 2014 @ 13:52:25

      Their perceived inequality is to me their seared conscience feeling condemnation. It is amazing how much clout this minority of 1-2% of the 340 million are running roughshod over the supposed majority rule Democracy we live in.

      On the abortion note, i find it absolutely disgusting that there is a stem cell industry harvesting aborted fetus’s and majority of Americans think planned parenthood is necessary. One feeds the other in this zombie mentality that shows no regard for babies in the womb other than a chance to enhance the flavor of coffee creamers.


Leave a Reply to Mannyr Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: