Perseverance of the Saints


    Lest we forget, the term apologetics means a defense of the faith, not  a tearing down of others in Christ.

You are welcome to distribute printed copies of this document, or copy and  paste this document to distribute via email, as long as the document is unaltered    and kept in its entirety (including copyright notices), and is not sold for profit.    However, if you wish to post this material on your website or anywhere else      online, you must first contact us to get permission. ©2007 by David Servant

 The Five Points of Calvinism Considered

By David Servant

3. Perseverance of the Saints

Because Calvinists believe that God shows His irresistible grace to totally depraved people whom He has unconditionally elected before time, Calvinists have no choicebut to believe that it is impossible for a genuinely-saved person to forfeit his salvation. This is what the Calvinistic doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints is all about. True saints will persevere in faith, and if they don’t, they were never truly saved in the first place, according to Calvinists.

Piper certainly holds this view. Amazingly, however, at the start of his chapter about Perseverance of the Saints, he states,

Election is unconditional, but glorification is not. There are many warnings in Scripture that those who do not hold fast to Christ can be lost in the end (p. 23, prgh. 2).

Piper is correct in observing that there are many warnings in Scripture addressed to those who do not hold fast to Christ. Indeed, such people will be lost in the end. It is astounding, however, that Piper cannot see the glaring contradiction in what he says. Clearly, if a person is genuinely saved due to God’s unconditional election and irresistible grace, then there is no possibility of him losing his salvation. Thus, ifelection is unconditional, glorification must of necessity also be unconditional. If one is elected, he must by definition eventually be glorified. This very truth Piper has already declared one paragraph earlier: It follows from what was just said [Piper’s interpretation of Romans 8:28-33] that the people of God will persevere. The foreknown are predestined, the predestined are called, the called are justified, and the justified are glorified. No one is lost from this group. To belong to this people is to be eternally secure (p. 23, prgh. 1).

How can it be true that the elect will certainly be glorifiedand the elect may not be glorified? Both can’t be true, yet Piper says otherwise! He blatantly contradicts himself in the space of a few sentences.

Moreover, logic dictates that if people are saved due to God’s unconditional election and irresistible grace, there is no sound reason for Scripture to warn anyone to persevere in faith. Those who are genuinely saved will persevere in faith and cannot do otherwise. They need no encouragement, because their salvation has been guaranteed since the foundation of the world. Likewise, those who are only phony believers have no reason to be encouraged, because their faith isn’t genuine, and it is certain that they won’t persevere, because their damnation has been guaranteed since the foundation of the world. To encourage such a person is to encourage him to remain deceived a little longer, until he discovers the inevitable—he has been predestined to be damned, and there is no reason for him to attempt to persevere in faith. His faith is bogus.

That is why it is virtually impossible for a consistent Calvinist to have absolute certainty of his salvation until his final breath, because he must always live with the fear that his faith may prove to be bogus if he doesn’t persevere in faith until death.

Again, if unconditional election is true, conditional glorification cannot be true. If conditional glorification is true (which it is), unconditional election cannot be true. Yet Piper repeatedly maintains that both are true. For example, he writes: We do not breathe easy after a person has prayed to receive Christ, as though we can be assured from our perspective that they are now beyond the reach of the evil one. There is a fight of faith to be fought. We must endure to the end in faith if we are to be saved (p. 23, prgh. 4).

Here Piper says that a person who has prayed to receive Christ is not “beyond the reach of the evil one.” But if that person is one of those who was predestined to be damned, he has not been truly saved in the first place and his prayer was ineffectual. He never escaped Satan’s clutches. If, on the other hand, the person is among those predestined to be saved, then there is no possibility of his forfeiting his salvation. And if he, being elected, is not beyond the reach of the evil one (as Piper says), then Satan is more powerful than God, and Piper has voided God’s sovereignty, something no good Calvinist should do!

A few paragraphs later, Piper reverses his position again, writing, God’s elect cannot be lost. This is why we believe in eternal security—namely, the eternal security of the elect. The implication is that God will so work that those whom he has chosen for eternal salvation will be enabled by him to persevere in faith to the end…” (p. 24, prgh. 7).

But if this is true, why are there so many scriptural warnings to believers against falling away from the faith, many of which Piper lists (e.g., Mark 13:13; 1 Cor. 15:1-2; Col. 1:21-23; 2 Tim. 2:11-12; Rev. 2:7, 10-11, 17, 25-26; 3:5, 11-12, 21)? If true believers can’t fall away, why would Jesus and Paul warn them about what can’t possibly happen?

The truth is, Scripture repeatedly warns believers against falling away because it is possible for genuine believers to fall away. For the same reason, Scripture also repeatedly admonishes believers to continue in the faith. All of such scriptures stand in direct contradiction to the Calvinistic doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints.

Piper then quotes from Jesus’ words in John 10:26-30 to prove that the elect cannot be lost. This passage of Scripture is the favorite of just about all who believe in eternal security, whether they are Calvinists or not: But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep. My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me; and I give eternal life to them, and they shall never perish; and no one shall snatch them out of My hand. My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of the Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.

This passage of scripture, of course, is not the only passage of scripture in the Bible. It highlights the faithfulness of Christ, but notice that it also mentions some characteristics of those to whom Christ is faithful: Jesus’ sheep hear His voice and follow Him. They are the ones who shall never perish or be snatched out of His hand. This fits perfectly with the testimony of the rest of Scripture. As long as we continue in faith, as evidenced by our following Jesus, we need not fear that we will perish or be snatched out of our Father’s hand. If we stop following Jesus, we are no longer His sheep.

This scripture, like so many others, teaches a conditional eternal security. That is, we must continue to follow Jesus to ultimately be saved. Yet Piper uses this scripture to buttress his view of unconditional eternal security which stands in direct contradiction to his view of conditional glorification, which is nothing less than conditional eternal security! Piper believes in both unconditional eternal security (based on the doctrine of unconditional election) and conditional eternal security (based on the doctrine of conditional glorification). He is a very inconsistent Calvinist.

In this same chapter, Piper reverses his position again. Writing about believers who fall away, Piper says, The fact that such a thing is possible [believers falling away] is precisely why the ministry of the Word in every local church must contain many admonitions to the church members to persevere in faith and not be entangled in those things which could possibly strangle them and result in their condemnation (p. 25, prgh. 3, emphasis added).

I couldn’t agree more with that statement. But Piper again contradicts himself. After telling us that it is impossible for the elect to be lost, Piper now tells us that we must admonish church members to persevere in faith and not be entangled in those things which could result in their condemnation! But do these church members have a genuine faith? If yes, then they are among the elect and it is impossible for them to be ultimately condemned (according to Piper and all other Calvinists)! They need no admonishing. Or, is their faith bogus? If yes, then they are currently not saved and need no admonishing to continue in a faith that isn’t genuine. They need to be saved, but will only be if they, according to Calvinism, have been unconditionally elected. And if they are not among those elect, then it is impossible for them not to be condemned (according to Piper and all other Calvinists)! We deceive such people even more if we encourage them to persevere in faith, because we give them a false hope that they are currently genuinely saved!

In summary, we see that the Calvinistic doctrine of the Perseverance of the Saints is, for the Calvinist, an absolutely necessary doctrine, even though it is unbiblical. If God bestows His irresistible grace on totally depraved people whom He has unconditionally elected, then it would have to be, of necessity, impossible for any of those people to forfeit the salvation that God gave them against their totally depraved wills. They are, of course, robots from start to finish. And it can be no other way in Calvin’s system of theology.

However, if people possess wills that are free enough to repent and believe under  God’s prevenient grace, and if God has chosen from the foundation of the world to give eternal life to all who will believe, then it stands to reason that it is possible for regenerate people to fall away from faith by the exercise of their free wills, just as the New Testament repeatedly teaches. Because conditional glorification is indeed true, then unconditional election cannot be true. If there is an election (which there is) then it must be conditional. Thus the Calvinistic doctrine of Unconditional Election falls with the Calvinistic doctrine of Perseverance of the Saints.

40 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. voyance gratuite
    Dec 22, 2013 @ 20:06:40

    Gredat artіcle, just what I needed.


  2. la voyance gratuite
    Dec 27, 2013 @ 04:40:35

    Howdy! This аrtiсle couldn’t be written much better! Looking at this
    post reminds me of my prevіous roommate! He constantly kept talking about this.
    I most certainly will send this post to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a very good read.
    Thanks for sharing!


  3. parajumpers jacka rea
    Dec 28, 2013 @ 10:49:40

    I will right away clutch your rss as I can not find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.

    Do you have any? Please permit me recognise in ordeer that I mmay just subscribe.


    Dec 28, 2013 @ 23:42:26

    I got this ωebsite from my friend whο informed mе about this website
    anԁ at the moment this time I am browsing this web site аnd reading very informative аrticles or гeѵiewѕ at this time.


    Dec 29, 2013 @ 03:23:48

    Thеre’s ceгtainly a lot to fіnd out about this subject.
    I really like all the points you made.


    Dec 29, 2013 @ 07:07:11

    Hi there, I found yοur site by the use of Google even as
    lοoking for a related matter, уour site came up, it seems to be good.
    I hаve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simplу become alert to your blog through Google, аnd lоcated thаt it’s truly informative.
    I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful
    for those who proceed this іn future. Many folks ѕhall be benefited from your ωriting.


  7. r4 pour 3Ds
    Dec 30, 2013 @ 08:00:47

    There’ѕ certainly a lot to find out about this
    subject. I love all οf the pоints you’ve made.


  8. Chris
    Jan 01, 2014 @ 20:47:23

    Hi Manny. Happy New Year!

    When a blogging preacher told me that I was going to hell because I wouldn’t take a position on “once saved always saved,” I looked up a number of verses that seem to indicate otherwise. The “conversation” can be seen in the “about” section on my blog.

    I think David Servant makes a good number of points here. It is apparent that Mr. Piper contradicts himself more than once on this topic.

    Thanks for another educational post my friend.

    God’s blessings…


  9. voyance gratuite
    Jan 08, 2014 @ 21:51:08

    Hey! I understand this is kіnd of off-topіc hоwever I had to ask.
    Does operating а well-established blog such as yours take
    a large amount of woгk? I’m completely new to wrіting a blog but
    I do write in my ԁiary ԁaily. I’d like tto start a blog so I can share
    my own eхperience and feelings online. Please let
    me know if you have any iԁеas or tiops for branjd new aѕpirіng bloggers.

    Appreciate it!


    • Mannyr
      Jan 10, 2014 @ 01:31:46

      WordPress has a lot to offer along with videos on “How to.” I have enjoyed working with a WordPress blog.A tip try to post things that are interesting or not covered by a lot of other blogs.


  10. voyance gratuite
    Jan 09, 2014 @ 12:38:07

    Gгeate post. Keеp wгiting such kind of information on your page.

    Im гeally impressed by your blоg.
    Heу there, You have performed an incredible job.
    I’ll certainly digg it and іndividually
    suggest to my friends. I am cоnfident they’llbe beneftited frоm this
    web site.


  11. voyance gratuite
    Jan 09, 2014 @ 16:07:16

    What’ѕ up, after reаdіng this awesome post i am as well glad to share my knowledge
    here with friеnds.


  12. voyance gratuite
    Jan 09, 2014 @ 22:33:51

    Hey! Ι know this is kind of off topic but
    I was wondering which bkog plаtfoгm are уοu using for this site?
    I’m getting tirеd оf WordPress becаuse I’ve had problems wіth hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform.
    I would be great if you could pοint me in the direсtion
    of a good plаtform.


  13. voyance gratuite
    Jan 09, 2014 @ 22:38:28

    magnificent pointѕ altogether, you јust gained a
    brand new reader. What would you suggest about your post that you made some days
    in thе past? Any certain?


  14. voyance gratuite
    Jan 10, 2014 @ 00:06:46

    I beliеve everything posted waаs actually very reasonable.
    However, what about this? suppose you addеd a little cοntent?
    I mean, I don’t wiѕh to tell you how to run your blog, however suppose yоu added a title that grabbed folk’s attention?
    I meаn Perseverance of the Saints | Crackеd-Poot is kinda boring.
    You oufht to peek at Yahoo’s front page and see how they crеate
    news headlines to grab viewers to click. Yοu might add а vіdeo or a related pic or
    two to grab readers excited about everything’ve written.
    In my оpinion, it would bring yyour posts a little livelier.


  15. voyance gratuite
    Jan 10, 2014 @ 02:22:36

    Nіce post. I learn something nеw and challenging on websites
    I stumbleupon eѵery day. It will always be uѕeful to reаd content fгom otheг authοrs and pгactice a little something from their websites.


  16. beijing massage
    Jan 10, 2014 @ 12:23:52

    I like your website content very much,can I on my website reprint your article?


  17. cheap jordans
    Jan 10, 2014 @ 17:21:03

    Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!


  18. voyance
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 00:06:33

    Gοod day! Do you use Twitter? I’d like ttо follow you if that
    would be ok. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and loοk forward
    tо new updates.


  19. voyance
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 03:45:52

    I blog frеquenty annԁ I seriously appreciate
    your information. The article has truly peаked myy interest.

    I’m going to bookmark your blog and keep checkіng foг new informatіon about onxe per week.
    I оpteԁ in for your RSS feed too.


  20. voyance gratuite
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 08:55:52

    Usually I dо not learn post on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very compelled me tto
    take a look at annd ԁo so! Your writing style has been surprised me.

    Thank you, quite great article.


  21. jordans for sale
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 12:05:25

    An intriguing discussion is worth comment. I think which you should write additional on this topic, it might not be a taboo topic but normally many people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers
    jordans for sale


  22. isabel marant
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 15:58:53

    Aw, this was a definitely nice post. In concept I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to create a incredibly great article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to obtain some thing carried out.


  23. voyance par telephone
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 17:00:22

    of cоurse like your website however you need to test the spelling
    on several of youг posts. Several of them are rife
    wіth spelling problems and I fіnd it veгy bothersome tо tell the reality оn the other hand I’ll certainly come back again.


  24. voyance gratuite
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 17:11:09

    Unԁeniably imagine that that you said. Yourr favourite reason appeasred to be on the nеt the easiest thing to keep in mind of.
    I say to you, I certainly get іrked at the same time as folks consider issues that they juіst
    don’t recognize about. You controlled to hit the
    nail upon the highesѕt andd also outlіned out thе whole thing with no need side-effects ,folks could take a signal.
    Will probably be agаin to get more. Thank you


  25. cheap jordans free shipping
    Jan 13, 2014 @ 20:11:13

    I am regularly to blogging and i actually appreciate your content. The article has definitely peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your internet site and keep checking for new information.
    cheap jordans free shipping


  26. isabel marant
    Jan 14, 2014 @ 02:13:08

    Can I just say what a relief to come across a person who really knows what theyre talking about online. You surely know easy methods to bring an concern to light and make it very important. More many people must read this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more well known simply because you certainly have the gift.
    isabel marant


  27. voyance par telephone
    Jan 14, 2014 @ 07:55:00

    I am truly pleasxed tto glance at this blog posts which includes tons of valuable information, thanks for providing such data.


If you enjoyed the post, please let me know: like it, share it, subscribe to it, or leave a comment (I read and respond to every remark). God bless you.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: